szymon1051 pisze:
Ale niżej jest. Sugerowałem się tym pisząc pierwszy post.
Summary:
Tor (or I2P):
Lets you access the Internet (but be careful!).
freenet
Więc wreszcie jak? Pozwala się łączyć się z internetem czy nie?
Zacytuję całość:
Summary:
Tor (or I2P):
Lets you access the Internet (but be careful!).
Lets you access anonymous web servers and other services.
Lets you host anonymous web servers, which need to be kept online, and can be DoS'ed, but can run any dynamic or server-side content you want.
Provides reasonable anonymity
Has been blocked by several countries, with varying success. Even its hidden bridges can be harvested and blocked with moderate effort.
Is somewhat centralised
Is more mature and has more users and developers
Freenet in general:
Only lets you access content uploaded to Freenet, including (static) websites, email, filesharing, forums, microblogging, etc. All of which are anonymous (or pseudonymous i.e. you create an untraceable identity).
Hosts content in a distributed way: You don't know what your node is storing, any given content is distributed across many nodes.
Ensures that popular content will be available forever.
Is older than Tor, but more experimental (arguably it's a harder task).
To jest krótkie podsumowanie czym się różni Freenet (w pewnym sensie zdecentralizowana baza danych) od sieci anonimizujących (TOR, I2P).
Zdanie, że umożliwia przeglądanie Internetu ("Lets you access the Internet (but be careful!).") dotyczy TOR i ewentualnie I2P, nie zaś Freenetu.
W opisie Freenetu jest "Only lets you access content uploaded to Freenet, including (static) websites, email, filesharing, forums, microblogging, etc. All of which are anonymous (or pseudonymous i.e. you create an untraceable identity).".
.