Bardzo dobrze, że w ogóle odpisujesz
Ja nie chcę nikogo oskarżać ale pracując w IT już wiele widziałem
Opowiedzenie czy pokazanie konstrukcji nie doprowadzi, że kogoś okradną. Ale dobrze by było znać szczegóły tej retencji danych. Jakie są to urządzenia i w jaki sposób przechowują dane. Gotówka jest na pewno ubezpieczona w samej maszynie i nikt jej nie wyniesie na plecach. Bardziej mnie interesuje strona techniczna z jaką gorliwością względem prawa stosujecie się do tej retencji danych.
Np. Filmy na jutjub sa nagrywane tendencyjnie, w taki sposób żeby przemilczeć wiele spraw. Dopiero z forów dowiadujemy się, że są klauzule o niezakrywaniu twarzy, ludzie skarżą się na okulary, takie bits of information to tu to tam. Kto czy co odpowiada za rozpoznawanie zakrytej twarzy?
Po co w ogóle ta kamera skoro wystarczyło zrobić interfejs do podania maila czy telefonu? Nie wiem jakie są minima autoryzacyjne ale na pewno można było z tego wybrnąć.
Pytałem też czy te paragony co wychodzą to są paragony fiskalne? Czy w urządzeniach jest kasa fiskalna? Jak jest to czy jest online czy offline?
Dodano po 1 godzinie 5 minutach 10 sekundach:
Jak się wchodzi na waszą stronę shitcoins.club to jest taki tekst ale po fransusku. Google translator tak to zamienia na angielski... O co chodzi?
Dear,
Following the seizure by the French police of our distributors on 12/18/2020, we would like to give you the explanations.
Our company ATS Automated Tellers Solution Sp. Z o. o with its subsidiary in France held its activity on French territory before the modification of the Monetary and Financial Code law introduced on 05/22/2019.
Thanks to the transition period, we were not obliged to register this type of activity before the date of 12/18/2020 inclusive.
We have posted information on our website as well as in the regulations of our company that we work on on French territory. We have never mentioned the name of another company anywhere.
According to the investigators, our office in Lille was kept in a 'non-transparent' way, although there was all the information requested: the information that the distributors belonged to the company ATS as well as a reference to our website where the company name was clearly displayed.
In addition there was information for customers regarding the need for verification of identity documents by the scanner integrated in the vending machine for transactions equal to and greater than 1000 EUR.
This verification is carried out by our monitoring for suspicious transactions.
We have nothing in common with the Bitcoin Technologies company so. z o. o registered in Poland and which was mentioned by investigators in press releases.
It has never been mentioned in any of our premises or website.
We do not understand why investigators point to this company.
The only company which operates on French territory and which has always belonged to us is ATS.
We believe this is a misunderstanding and investigators misinterpreted the Monetary and Financial Code admitting that the deadline for the transition expired on 12/18/2020 when indeed it was a day later.
It seems to us that someone found the name of this Bitcoin Technologies company (also from Poland) on the internet and indicated our company while even on the seals left by the police on our premises, we can find the name of the company. company ATS.
Yet ATS had the legal authority to operate on 12/18/2020.
The sister company issues mentioned by the German police spokeswoman have the same source - this was a misinterpretation of the transition period by the German supervisor.
The sister company problems in Germany reported by the police spokesperson were also linked to a misinterpretation of the transition period in this case by the German supervisor.
The German supervisor decided that this period did not include us, because before his operation, our activity was regulated. This contradicts, for example, the case law of the German criminal courts, for example in the judgment of the Berlin Court of Appeal in the case of September 25, 2018, case number KG- (4) 161 Ss 28/18 (35 / 18), 4 35/18.
In the end, we are waiting for a similar solution in France and we think that in France the question of ATS limited liability company is even more obvious.
We agree to publish this statement only in its entirety.